Florida boards fire management companies more often than the public reporting suggests, and after HB 1203 and HB 913 the legal terrain is sharper in both directions — boards have stronger statutory tools, and managers have steeper criminal exposure for stalling records turnover. The Hammocks Community Association fraud case in West Kendall, the C and M Property Management indictment in Stuart, the Avant-Garde Property Management embezzlement case in Martin County, and the Stonebridge Place situation in Orlando all hit the public record in the last three years. They are why the statute book changed. They are also why a Florida board considering a management-company change in 2026 needs to run the process with discipline rather than improvisation.

This guide walks the operational and legal mechanics of terminating a Florida HOA or condo association management contract — the pre-termination audit, the statutory framework, the notice and records-turnover playbook, the 30-60-90 day transition, the replacement decision, and the real cases that show what works and what fails. Pair it with our HOA management company cost guide for the cost analysis, our can a Florida HOA be self-managed guide for the alternative path, and our 2027 budget guide for the financial-planning context.

This article is general information for Florida HOA and condo boards, not legal advice. Florida community-association statutes are amended frequently — verify any specific subsection at flsenate.gov before relying on it. The cases discussed are matters of public record but every termination has facts and contract terms unique to the association. Consult a licensed Florida community-association attorney before issuing a termination notice.

Why boards fire management companies in Florida

The Florida community-association industry does not publish reliable statistics on management-company turnover, but the documented reasons in the cases that have surfaced fall into a small set of categories.

The legislative response has been substantial. HB 1203 (2024) criminalized records destruction and director kickbacks, lowered the HOA records-website threshold to 100 parcels, and tightened CAM continuing-education obligations specifically around records and accounting. HB 1021 (2024) required condo management contracts to include a 12-point professional-standards disclosure (with voidability if missing), expanded the records definition, and codified the 20-business-day records-turnover clock. HB 913 (2025) added director affidavits acknowledging receipt of the SIRS and the annual financial report, and broadened CAM conflict-of-interest disclosure obligations.

Five Florida statutes govern almost every termination decision a board makes.

FS 468.4334 — CAM fiduciary duty and the records-turnover clock

The CAM fiduciary statute requires the manager and management firm to act loyally, skillfully, diligently, honestly, and in good faith, with full disclosure to the association, and to account for all funds. Subsection (3) imposes the records-turnover obligation: all official records of the association must be returned within 20 business days of termination of the contract or a written request, whichever comes first. Failure creates a rebuttable presumption of willful non-compliance and triggers a statutory penalty of $1,000 per day for up to 10 business days — a $10,000 cap — beginning on the 21st business day. License suspension follows.

FS 718.3025 — condo management contract requirements

Condo management contracts are unenforceable unless in writing and containing specific provisions: scope of services, costs reimbursable by the association, frequency of service, minimum personnel, and disclosure of any developer or board-member financial interest in the contracting party. Critically, services or obligations not stated on the face of the contract are unenforceable. If the manager is invoicing for items not contracted for, those charges are unenforceable.

HB 1021 added a key provision for board leverage: condo management contracts must include a statement in 12-point font affirming compliance with Chapter 468 professional standards. If the disclosure is missing, the contract is voidable and the association may terminate by written notice without penalty.

FS 720.3055 — HOA contracts and the powerful member-cancellation right

The HOA contract statute requires written contracts for any agreement not fully performed within one year and competitive bidding for contracts exceeding 10 percent of total annual budget (with carve-outs for CAM services, attorneys, accountants, and emergencies). The provision boards rarely use but should know about is FS 720.3055(2)(c): any member may move to bring a contract to a vote of the membership, and a majority of members present may cancel it. When members cancel a contract this way, the association is liable only for the reasonable value of goods and services rendered up to the cancellation — not for any termination fee, liquidated damages, or penalty. This is a backdoor escape valve when the contract has a punitive liquidated-damages clause that the board cannot avoid through its own action.

HB 1203 (2024) — criminal penalties for records misconduct

HB 1203 made knowing destruction or defacement of association accounting records a first-degree misdemeanor, and willful refusal to release association records a third-degree felony. Director kickbacks are now a third-degree felony as well. HOAs must produce subpoenaed records within 5 business days. Directors charged with theft, embezzlement, ballot forgery, records destruction, obstruction, or fraudulent voting must be immediately removed from the board. Conflict-of-interest contracts require two-thirds board approval and must be in the official records.

HB 1021 (2024) — condo records and management disclosure

HB 1021 codified the 20-business-day CAM records-turnover clock, expanded the records definition to include invoices, transaction receipts, deposit slips, and building permits, and required associations to maintain records "in an organized manner that facilitates inspection." If records are lost or destroyed, the association has an affirmative obligation to make a good-faith recovery effort. The 12-point professional-standards contract disclosure is the contract-voidability hook described above.

The pre-termination audit

Do this work quietly, before signaling intent to the management company. The leverage in a termination is almost always in the contract you signed, not in the statutes alone.

The decision: where do you go next

Before issuing notice, the board should have already chosen the destination, not just the exit. Three live options.

New full-service management firm
  • Standard path; highest cost; lowest board labor
  • Best for 100+ unit condos and amenity-heavy communities
  • Florida 2026 typical range: $2,500-$8,000 per month for mid-rise condos plus per-unit fees
  • Verify CFCAM credential and FCAP membership of any candidate firm
Hybrid / financial-only firm
  • Outside firm handles AR, AP, bank reconciliations, statutory financials, tax filings
  • Board handles vendor coordination and resident communication
  • Sweet spot for 50-150 unit communities
  • Approximately 50 percent of full-service cost
Self-managed
  • Treasurer plus finance committee plus software
  • Realistic for under-50 unit communities and disciplined boards
  • Layer on AI assistant overlay for resident inquiries (Mosaic is one such option) plus CPA engagement plus HOA attorney on call
  • Total annual stack: roughly $8,000-$25,000 depending on size and software choices
What to look for in any successor
  • Active CAM Firm license + assigned CAM with active license
  • CFCAM (Certified Florida Community Association Manager) credential through FCAP
  • References from at least three Florida associations of similar size, type, and amenity profile
  • E&O insurance, fidelity bond, general liability with COI naming the association
  • Documented experience with HB 913, HB 1021, HB 1203, milestone inspections, SIRS

Florida law does not require a management company at any size — it is an operational decision, not a statutory one. Pair the decision framework with our can a Florida HOA be self-managed guide and our how to manage a small HOA guide.

Termination notice mechanics

Termination of a management contract is almost always a board action, not a member vote, unless the governing documents specify otherwise.

Board meeting

The notice letter

Try Mosaic alongside your current software. No Risk!

See how Mosaic works
Always Human Support • Florida Built • Easy Cancellation

The 30-60-90 day transition

This is where boards lose control. Run it on a written checklist with weekly status calls.

Horizontal 90-day Florida HOA management company termination transition timeline showing milestones at Day 0 termination notice, Day 7 records demand and bank notice, Day 20 records turnover deadline under FS 468.4334, Day 30 vendor handoff, Day 60 new manager onboarding, and Day 90 effective termination with final reconciliation
The 90-day transition workflow. Click to zoom.

Days 0-7 — notice and immediate priorities

Days 7-30 — records and vendor handoff

Days 30-60 — operations transition

Days 60-90 — final close

The records-turnover playbook

Records turnover is where most management terminations succeed or fail. The leverage Florida law gives boards is real but only if invoked correctly.

Diagram showing the four-layer Florida records turnover penalty stack for HOA management terminations including FS 468.4334 CAM fiduciary 1000 dollar per day for 10 business days, FS 720.303 director second-degree misdemeanor for repeated violations, HB 1203 first-degree misdemeanor for destruction and third-degree felony for willful refusal, and DBPR license suspension or revocation
The four-layer penalty stack a non-cooperating management firm faces. Click to zoom.

What constitutes records (comprehensive list)

The penalty stack if records are withheld

20 days
FS 468.4334 records turnover deadline (business days)
$10K
CAM-level statutory penalty cap ($1K/day × 10 days)
3rd-degree
HB 1203 felony for willful refusal to release records
5 days
HB 1203 HOA subpoenaed-records production clock

Some Florida management contracts attempt to charge $5,000 to $25,000 "transition" or "records-transfer" fees on exit. Florida statutes do not authorize a management firm to charge the association for records the association already owns under FS 718.111(12) and FS 720.303(5). Boards should refuse, file a DBPR complaint if charged, document everything, and let counsel respond.

The leading 2024 records-access ruling is Pecchia v. Wayside Estates HOA, 388 So.3d 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024), in which two owners of a self-managed HOA successfully sued for an injunction after the association stalled records production. The court emphasized that failure to promptly produce official records triggers fines and liability. The case is now cited alongside HB 1203 as the standard.

Replacement onboarding

If hiring a new firm, run an RFP. Florida statutory bidding thresholds for the association's other contracts (5 percent of annual budget for condos, 10 percent for HOAs) carve out CAM services, but the three-bid floor is professional standard and produces real price discipline.

RFP contents

Negotiate the new contract differently this time

Fix the clauses you wished you had this time:

Interview the proposed CAM, not just the firm — that individual is who residents will deal with. Verify the CAM's individual license at MyFloridaLicense.com and pull the disciplinary history.

Common pitfalls

Ten mistakes that make Florida management-company terminations go sideways

Real Florida cases

Four named cases from the 2022-2026 period demonstrate why Florida law tightened the records and conflict-of-interest framework, and what boards should learn from each.

The Hammocks Community Association — West Kendall

Florida's largest HOA fraud case and the catalyst for HB 1203. The Hammocks is a 6,500+ unit community in West Kendall with roughly 18,000 residents. In November 2022, five people including former president Marglli Gallego, her husband Jose Antonio Gonzalez, and three others were arrested and charged with diverting at least $2 million (later forensic accounting alleged over $4 million) through fake or no-work vendors. Same week, a Miami-Dade judge placed the HOA in receivership under retired judge David Gersten.

By 2023, the receiver had identified 55 bank accounts and credit cards and pegged total fraud at over $3 million. The Hammocks won a $2 million settlement against ex-leaders. In September 2024 Gersten transitioned from receiver to long-term monitor of all future elections. By 2024, more than $6 million had been recovered through settlements. On February 1, 2025, the receiver-supervised board selected Affinity Management Services as the new property manager, replacing the receiver-run setup. Eighth and additional arrests continued into late 2024.

The structural lesson: a clean board election paired with a reputable firm and an outside watchdog during the first year produced a workable recovery from a near-catastrophic fraud. The legal lesson is that records opacity is the leading indicator of fraud — every named case in this period started with blocked records before money disappeared.

C and M Property Management — Stuart and Palm City

In July 2024, owner Scott Michael Brechbill was charged with first-degree grand theft (over $100,000), second-degree grand theft, organized fraud (over $50,000), and obtaining property under $50,000. He allegedly transferred $820,777.51 from the Quail Meadow HOA account to C and M's own account, plus additional funds from Starling Court HOA — total over $800,000 across the two HOAs. Bond was set at $2.1 million. The investigation began in June 2023 after a Starling Court board member walked into the Martin County Sheriff's Office.

The lesson: co-mingled accounts are the whole scheme. The Brechbill case rested on funds flowing into the management firm's operating account. Modern best practice — and post-2024 legal expectation — is HOA money in HOA-titled accounts the board can audit independently of the manager.

Avant-Garde Property Management — Martin County

In April 2026, bookkeeper Alexandra Delacaridad Gonzalez surrendered to Martin County authorities to face a sweeping indictment including two counts of fraud over $50,000, two counts of grand theft, 61 counts of uttering false instruments, and 59 counts of embezzlement — well over 120 felony charges total. She allegedly wrote checks to herself, fabricated invoices, forged signatures, and falsified ledger entries at the Whitemarsh Reserve and Dunes of Hutchinson Island associations. Funds were traced to Disney World, New York City trips, plastic surgery, and shopping.

The lesson: inside-firm bookkeepers can cause as much damage as principals. License-and-bonding due diligence on the firm is necessary but not sufficient — boards need independent visibility into the bank ledger.

Stonebridge Place — Orlando

Former HOA president Tara Howie attempted to cash a $743,000 cashier's check of HOA funds. The bank stopped the transaction and opened a fraud case. Howie also charged personal items — phone bill, Macy's, Amazon — to HOA accounts. Critically, the previous management company (BlueSky) flagged the activity to Orlando police. The outgoing management firm was the whistleblower. Stonebridge then went through four management companies in nine months, paying approximately $18,000 in early-termination fees along the way. Stonebridge sued Howie, alleging she moved $750,000 of reserves into an account only she could access.

The lesson: the outgoing firm is often the best fraud detector if the termination is handled professionally. A bridge-burning termination loses that visibility. The Stonebridge churn — four firms in nine months — also shows that repeated quick-fire terminations are themselves a red flag and an opening for insider fraud.

For the broader operational view of association financial discipline, pair this with our HOA financial evaluation guide, our HOA balance sheet guide, our how to report HOA fraud guide, and our Florida HOA document request rights guide. Nolo's HOA legal encyclopedia, the Florida Bar consumer pamphlet, Becker, Kaye Bender Rembaum, and KSN Law all publish ongoing Florida community-association legal commentary. Every meaningful termination decision should run past the association's licensed Florida community-association attorney before the board votes.

Frequently asked questions

Subject to the contract. Most Florida HOA and condo management contracts allow termination without cause on 30, 60, or 90 days written notice (60 to 90 is most common), and termination for cause on shorter notice with a written cure period. Florida law adds two material escape valves that supersede the contract. Under HB 1021, condo management contracts must include a 12-point font professional-standards disclosure; if the disclosure is missing, the contract is voidable and the association may terminate by written notice without penalty. Under FS 720.3055(2)(c), members may bring any HOA contract to a vote and cancel it by majority of those present, in which case the association is not liable for any termination fee, liquidated damages, or other penalty. Always verify the specific notice address and method in the contract before sending notice — improper notice can invalidate the termination.

Within 20 business days of the termination notice or a written records request, whichever comes first. FS 468.4334(3) imposes a fiduciary obligation on the CAM and the management firm to return all official records within that window. Failure creates a rebuttable presumption of willful non-compliance and a statutory penalty of $1,000 per day for up to 10 business days, accruing on the 21st business day after termination. Knowing destruction of accounting records is a first-degree misdemeanor under HB 1203, and willful refusal to release records is a third-degree felony. Records belong to the association, not the manager, under FS 718.111(12) and FS 720.303(5). Boards should send the records-turnover demand by certified mail with return receipt on the same day as the termination notice — that starts the 20-business-day clock cleanly.

Florida courts enforce liquidated damages only when actual damages were difficult to ascertain at contract signing AND the stated amount is a reasonable forecast of those damages, not a penalty. Boards challenging a liquidated-damages clause should run the analysis with counsel before noticing termination. There is also a powerful statutory escape: under FS 720.3055(2)(c) for HOAs, if members vote by majority to cancel a contract, the association is statutorily not liable for any termination fee, liquidated damages, or other penalty. The condo equivalent flows from declaration and bylaws. When the contract has a punitive damages clause, the member-vote pathway often produces a cleaner exit than a board-only termination.

The board vote itself happens at a noticed board meeting open to members under FS 720.303(2) for HOAs and FS 718.112(2)(c) for condos. Standard notice for board meetings is 48 hours posted in a conspicuous place, with longer notice for specific topics. Boards routinely also send an informational letter to owners 7 to 14 days before the vote summarizing the rationale, although this is best practice rather than a statutory requirement. After adoption, the post-vote announcement to owners should cover the effective date, the rationale (factual, brief, no name-calling), what changes for owners, and what does not. Boards lose owner trust faster from a perceived secret termination than from any actual operational issue during transition.

Depends on size, amenity load, and board capacity. Communities under 25 units can almost always self-manage cost-effectively with bookkeeping software, an AI assistant for resident inquiries, a CPA for the annual report and tax return, and an HOA attorney on call. Communities 25 to 100 units often work well with a hybrid model — a financial-only management firm handling AR, AP, bank reconciliations, and statutory financials, with the board handling vendor coordination and resident communication. Communities above 100 units, especially condos with substantial amenities, generally need full-service management or an onsite CAM. Florida law does not require a management company at any size — it is an operational decision, not a statutory one. The board's fiduciary duty applies regardless of which path is chosen.

Share this guide