The Florida condo website rule just got dramatically smaller and dramatically more enforceable. For nine years, only condominium associations of 150 or more units had to maintain a website with statutorily-required documents. Then in 2024, HB 1021 (Ch. 2024-244) lowered the threshold to 25 units — effective January 1, 2026. In parallel, HB 1203 (Ch. 2024-221) created the first HOA website mandate at 100 parcels, effective January 1, 2025. And in 2025, HB 913 (Ch. 2025-175) added a 30-day posting deadline, three new required documents on the condo list, and gave the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation explicit investigative authority over website violations. As of today, every small Florida condo of 25-149 units that was not previously covered has been non-compliant for four and a half months — and DBPR enforcement just got teeth.

This article is general information about Florida community-association website requirements and is not legal advice. Determining your association's compliance, drafting any board policy, or responding to a DBPR complaint requires your association's attorney. Always engage counsel before relying on any of the operational guidance below.

25 / 100 / 18 / $5,000
The four numbers that define Florida association website compliance in 2026.
25 — minimum condo units now requiring a website (was 150). 100 — minimum HOA parcels. 18 — categories of documents a covered condo must post (was 15 before HB 913). $5,000 — max DBPR fine per violation under FS 718.501.

The deadline most small condos just missed

Section 8 of HB 1021 (Chapter 2024-244, Laws of Florida) does something easy to miss. The general effective date of HB 1021 was July 1, 2024 — but section 8 specifically delays the website-threshold amendment to January 1, 2026. The enrolled bill text reads, in part: "Effective January 1, 2026, paragraph (g) of subsection (12) of section 718.111, Florida Statutes, as amended by this act, is amended to read: … An association managing a condominium with 25 or more units which does not contain timeshare units shall post digital copies of the documents specified in subparagraph 2."

The 150-unit threshold became a 25-unit threshold on January 1, 2026. Florida has thousands of condominium associations between 25 and 149 units — most of which had never been on the hook for a website before. As of mid-May 2026, those associations have been non-compliant for over four months.

Compliance is not optional. The Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (the DBPR division responsible for condo enforcement) received explicit website-investigation authority in July 2025 under HB 913. Under a separate HB 913 provision now codified at FS 718.501(3), every Florida condominium association has been required since October 1, 2025 to create and maintain an online account with the Division and provide information in an electronic format determined by the Division — giving the Division a centralized registry through which to audit. The combination of explicit website authority plus the registration program means the Division now has both the legal grounds and the practical visibility to enforce.

Two statutes, two different rules

The most common board confusion: assuming the condo and HOA rules are the same. They are not. The two statutes are structured differently, cover different documents, apply at different thresholds, took effect on different dates, and are enforced through different channels. A multi-property management company with a mixed portfolio of condos and HOAs needs to track two separate compliance regimes.

This article addresses both regimes in parallel. If you are on a condominium board, you can skim the HOA-specific sections. If you are on an HOA board, the condo sections still matter because residents in mixed communities (master HOAs over sub-condos, for example) will ask why their requirements differ.

Website posting is one of several compliance duties the recent statutes added. For the others, see our guides to Florida board member certification, condo EV-charging rules, and HOA solar panel rights — and the 2026 legislative session recap for what changed most recently.

Condo website requirement: FS 718.111(12)(g)

The condo website mandate sits in FS 718.111(12)(g). The statute requires every covered association to post specified documents in digital format, either on a website or through a downloadable mobile application. Either is statutorily sufficient. The website or application may be:

This means a vendor-hosted portal (such as yourassociation.vendor.com) satisfies the statute — a custom domain is not required. Compliance is a function of what is posted and how access is structured, not which URL the site lives at.

Mosaic, the Florida HOA and condo operations platform, is one such vendor — its association portals are configured around each community's specific bylaws and handle the public + gated subpage architecture out of the box.

Two access-structure requirements apply simultaneously. The statute requires both:

  1. The website or application must be accessible through the Internet (in other words, publicly reachable at a known URL).
  2. The site must contain a subpage, web portal, or other protected electronic location that is inaccessible to the general public and accessible only to unit owners and employees of the association.

Both surfaces are mandatory. A pure-public website is non-compliant. A pure-gated owner portal with no public face is non-compliant. The statute requires both.

The 18 documents every covered condo must post

FS 718.111(12)(g)2 lists 18 categories of documents that must appear on the association's website or mobile application. HB 913 added three of these in 2025 (items e, f, and r below) — bringing the total from 15 to the current 18.

Vertical infographic listing the 18 categories of documents Florida condominium associations must post on their website under FS 718.111(12)(g) — grouped into four visual buckets including Governance documents (declaration, bylaws, articles of incorporation, rules), Financial documents (annual budget, financial report, contracts with conflict-of-interest parties), Meetings and Notices (board minutes, video recordings of video-conference meetings, unit owner meeting notices and agendas, board meeting notices and agendas), and Inspections and Permits (inspection reports, structural integrity reserve study, building permits, required affidavits) — with small icons indicating public versus owner-gated placement and a soft amber callout highlighting the three items added by HB 913 in 2025
The condo statute requires 18 categories. HB 913 added three in July 2025 (minutes, video-conference recordings, affidavits). Click to zoom.
Item Document Note
aRecorded declaration of condominium, with each amendmentGovernance
bRecorded bylaws and each amendmentGovernance
cArticles of incorporation, with each amendment (filed with the FL Department of State)Governance
dThe rules of the associationGovernance
eApproved minutes of all board meetings (preceding 12 months)Added by HB 913 (2025)
fVideo recording (or hyperlink) for any meeting conducted by video conference (preceding 12 months)Added by HB 913 (2025)
gList of executory contracts + list of bids received in past year (bid summaries over $500 kept 1 year)Financial
hAnnual budget required by FS 718.112(2)(f); any proposed budgetFinancial
iFinancial report required by FS 718.111(13); monthly income/expense statementsFinancial
jCertification of each director required by FS 718.112(2)(d)5.b.Governance
kContracts/transactions between the association and any director, officer, or related corporationConflict of interest
lAny contract or document regarding a conflict (or possible conflict) of interestConflict of interest
mNotice of any unit owner meeting + agenda (no later than 14 days before)Meeting notice
nNotice of any board meeting + agenda (per FS 718.112(2)(c) timeline)Meeting notice
oInspection reports per FS 553.899 and FS 718.301(4)(p) and other structural/life-safety inspectionsInspections
pMost recent structural integrity reserve study (SIRS), if applicableInspections
qAll building permits issued for ongoing or planned constructionInspections
rAll affidavits required by Chapter 718Added by HB 913 (2025)

The statute requires redaction of restricted personal data regardless of where each document is placed. Per FS 718.111(12)(g)3, any record posted online must have personal identifying information removed if it would be restricted from inspection under FS 718.111(12)(c). This applies on both the public and gated sides.

HOA website requirement: FS 720.303(4)(b)

The HOA website mandate is newer — it was created from scratch by HB 1203 (Ch. 2024-221), section 3, and lives at FS 720.303(4)(b). Unlike the condo rule, which has been on the books since 2017 and was just lowered, the HOA rule did not exist before HB 1203.

The statute's opening sentence is direct: "By January 1, 2025, an association that has 100 or more parcels shall post the following documents on its website or make available such documents through an application that can be downloaded on a mobile device." There is no graduated phase-in. Every HOA of 100 or more parcels has been on the hook since January 1, 2025 — nearly 17 months as of today.

The "parcel" definition matters. Per FS 720.301(11), "parcel" means a platted or unplatted lot, tract, unit, or other subdivision of real property within the community. Recreational and common-area lots typically do not count toward the threshold. Associations near the 100-parcel line should pull the actual count from the county property appraiser, not from the original developer's marketing materials.

The dual-access structure is identical to the condo rule: the website or application must be publicly reachable on the Internet AND must contain a gated subpage accessible only to parcel owners and employees of the association.

The 13 documents every covered HOA must post

FS 720.303(4)(b)1 lists 13 categories of required documents. The list overlaps substantially with the condo list but has two notable differences: HOAs are not required to post board meeting minutes or video recordings (the items HB 913 added for condos), but HOAs are required to post the association's current insurance policies — an item that does not appear in the condo statute.

Item Document Note
aArticles of incorporation and each amendmentGovernance
bRecorded bylaws and each amendmentGovernance
cDeclaration of covenants and each amendmentGovernance
dCurrent rules of the associationGovernance
eList of current executory contracts + list of bids received in past yearFinancial
fAnnual budget required by FS 720.303(6); any proposed annual-meeting budgetFinancial
gFinancial report required by FS 720.303(7); monthly income/expense statementsFinancial
hThe association's current insurance policiesHOA-only requirement
iCertification of each director required by FS 720.3033(1)(a)Governance
jContracts/transactions between the association and any director, officer, or related corporationConflict of interest
kAny contract or document regarding a conflict (or possible conflict) of interestConflict of interest
lNotice of any member meeting and agenda (no later than 14 days before)Meeting notice
mNotice of any board meeting, agenda, and any required document for the meetingMeeting notice

Posting the current insurance policies is the most operationally awkward item for HOA boards. Master policies are long, technical, and often include declarations pages with broker contact information that owners can misuse. Many associations post the declarations page summary plus the named insured / coverage section, redacting personal information — check with your association's attorney on the appropriate level of detail.

Side-by-side: condo vs HOA

This is the comparison your board will reference any time someone asks why the rules feel similar but not identical.

Side-by-side comparison infographic of Florida condo association website compliance requirements under FS 718.111(12)(g) versus HOA website compliance requirements under FS 720.303(4)(b) — showing the condo column with 25-unit threshold effective January 1 2026 18 documents required including board minutes and video recordings DBPR enforcement up to 5000 dollar fines per violation, the HOA column with 100-parcel threshold effective January 1 2025 13 documents required including the unique insurance policies posting requirement civil and criminal enforcement only with 50 dollars per day damages, and shared requirements at the bottom showing both require public plus owner-only subpage and both permit mobile app or third-party vendor hosting
Two statutes, two thresholds, two enforcement regimes. Where does your association sit? Click to zoom.
Element Condo (FS 718.111(12)(g)) HOA (FS 720.303(4)(b))
Threshold25+ units (excludes timeshares)100+ parcels
Effective dateJanuary 1, 2026 (for newly-covered 25-149 unit associations)January 1, 2025
Number of required documents18 categories (15 before HB 913)13 categories
Posting deadline per record30 days after creation/receipt"Current copy" (no fixed deadline)
Board minutes postingRequired (preceding 12 months)Not required
Video-conference recording postingRequired (preceding 12 months)Not required
Insurance policy postingNot requiredRequired (item h)
Building permit postingRequiredNot required
Affidavit postingRequired (HB 913)Not required
Public + owner-only structureRequiredRequired
Mobile app substitute permittedYesYes
Third-party vendor host permittedYesYes
State regulatorDBPR Division of Condominiums (post-turnover)None — civil and criminal only
Civil penalty capUp to $5,000 per violation (DBPR)$50/day owner damages

What about cooperatives (Chapter 719)?

No statutory website requirement applies to cooperatives. FS 719.104, the official-records section for cooperatives, does not impose a website obligation. FS 719.106 references a website only conditionally — e.g., for posting the structural integrity reserve study summary if the association already has one — but the conditional reference does not create a free-standing mandate. HB 913 made many cooperative changes that parallel the condo amendments but did not extend the website mandate to Chapter 719.

Cooperative boards should nonetheless confirm whether their own governing documents independently obligate a website. Those private obligations are enforceable as a matter of contract law, even though Chapter 719 does not impose them. If your co-op declaration or bylaws reference a website, treat it as binding.

The 30-day posting deadline (new in 2025)

HB 913 added a hard 30-day posting deadline to the condo statute. The current text of FS 718.111(12)(g) reads: "Unless a shorter period is otherwise required, a document must be made available on the association's website or made available for download through an application on a mobile device within 30 days after the association receives or creates an official record specified in subparagraph 2."

The clock starts on the later of receipt or creation. For an executed contract returned by the vendor three weeks after the board signed, the 30-day clock starts when the fully-executed copy arrives, not when the board first executed.

Shorter statutory deadlines override the 30-day default for two important items:

The HOA statute does not impose an equivalent 30-day deadline. It requires a "current copy" of each document — which case law treats as a similar real-time obligation in practice, but without the bright-line clock.

Try Mosaic alongside your current software. No Risk!

See how Mosaic works
Always Human Support • Florida Built • Easy Cancellation

Public vs owner-only: what goes where

Both statutes require the dual-access structure but neither tells you which documents belong on which side. The decision is left to the board, with one statutory constraint: any personal identifying information that would be restricted from inspection under the records-access provisions (FS 718.111(12)(c) for condos, FS 720.303(5) for HOAs) must be redacted regardless of placement.

The conservative reading most Florida community-association attorneys recommend:

Boards most commonly err in the other direction — posting financial reports, full contracts (which may include vendor bank account routing numbers), and director certifications on the public side without redaction. That is a records-access violation that can be enforced by either a private owner action or, for condos, by DBPR. When in doubt, place a document behind the owner-only gate.

Enforcement: DBPR for condos, lawsuits for HOAs

The enforcement track is the single biggest practical difference between the condo and HOA rules.

Condo enforcement — DBPR (newly enabled by HB 913)

Before July 2025, DBPR's investigative authority over website violations was implicit at best. HB 913 fixed that. The bill added FS 718.501(1)(u), which reads: "If the division receives a complaint regarding access to official records on the association's website or through an application that can be downloaded on a mobile device under s. 718.111(12)(g), the division may request access to the association's website or application and investigate. The division may adopt rules to carry out this paragraph."

The Division can now formally investigate a website complaint, request access, and pursue civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation under FS 718.501(1)(e). The October 1, 2025 online-account registration program under FS 718.501(3) also gives the Division a centralized point of contact with every condo association in the state, which simplifies any audit or complaint workflow that begins with "we tried to reach the association."

The condo statute contains a softener at FS 718.111(12)(g)4: failure to post does not, by itself, invalidate any board action or decision. That protects the legitimacy of board operations but does not eliminate the underlying regulatory and civil liability for non-posting.

HOA enforcement — civil suits and criminal charges (no DBPR)

Florida's HOA chapter is materially un-regulated at the agency level. DBPR's jurisdiction over Chapter 720 is limited to election and recall arbitration. Website violations are enforced through the general records-access framework of FS 720.303(5):

The civil $50/day damages are the most common enforcement reality for HOA website non-compliance. Aggrieved owners file in county court; the burden is low; the standard exposure compounds quickly. A six-month dispute over a missing financial report can reach $9,000 in damages plus the owner's attorney fees.

A 6-step compliance audit you can run this week

The simplest way to know whether your association is compliant is to actually try to access every required document — from a logged-out browser session, the same way DBPR or a complaining owner would. Walk through these six steps.

  1. Open your association's URL in a private/incognito browser window. If you cannot find the URL, that is the first compliance gap. Every Florida condo association is now required to register its URL with DBPR. If yours is not registered, fix that first.
  2. Confirm the public side loads without requiring any login. Note which documents are visible to the public.
  3. Locate the owner-only subpage or login portal. Confirm it exists. Confirm it requires authentication. Confirm an owner can actually log in. (Test with a real owner credential, not the manager's master account.)
  4. Run through the document checklist for your association type. For condos, work down the 18 categories from the table above. For HOAs, the 13 categories. Mark each as "present and current," "present but stale," or "missing."
  5. Spot-check the redaction. Open any contract or financial document. Verify that personal identifying information (account numbers, social-security-related digits, home addresses for individuals other than officers acting in their official capacity) has been redacted. Boards routinely fail this step.
  6. Check the 30-day deadline (condos only). Pick any document created or received in the last 60 days — an executed vendor contract, the most recent monthly income statement, the latest board meeting minutes. Confirm the posted-date is within 30 days of the creation/receipt date. If it is not, document the delay in your audit notes and tighten the posting workflow.

If your audit surfaces compliance gaps, document them in board meeting minutes and set a remediation deadline. A documented good-faith remediation effort is your strongest defense if a complaint is filed later. Trying to backfill quietly after a complaint hits is much worse than acknowledging the gap and fixing it transparently. If a DBPR complaint or an owner records demand has already landed, engage a Florida community-association attorney before responding.

If your current setup makes hitting the 30-day deadline hard (board minutes still living in email threads, contracts still in a manager's filing cabinet, financial reports posted manually by a volunteer treasurer when they remember), the structural fix is a platform that publishes the record at the moment it is created or received. Mosaic and similar compliance-focused association tools handle this by design.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Effective January 1, 2026, FS 718.111(12)(g) requires every condominium association of 25 or more units (excluding timeshares) to maintain a website or downloadable mobile app where required documents are posted. The threshold was lowered from 150 units to 25 units by HB 1021 (Ch. 2024-244), section 8 — operative on the January 1, 2026 delayed effective date. Small associations of 25 to 149 units that were not previously covered have been on the hook since January 1, 2026 (about five months as of mid-May 2026). DBPR enforcement is now active through the investigative authority added by HB 913.
Three big differences. (1) Threshold: condos start at 25 units, HOAs at 100 parcels. (2) Effective date: HOAs since January 1, 2025; condos at the new lower threshold since January 1, 2026. (3) Documents required: condos must post 18 categories including board minutes, video-conference recordings, and affidavits (the last three added by HB 913); HOAs must post 13 categories including the association's current insurance policies. DBPR has enforcement jurisdiction over condo website violations under HB 913; HOAs are enforced by civil suits and criminal charges under FS 720.303(5), not by the Division.
Vendor-hosted portals satisfy the statute. FS 718.111(12)(g)1 expressly permits "a website, application, or web portal operated by a third-party provider" as long as the association has the right to operate a dedicated page or subpage on it. The same is true for HOAs under FS 720.303(4)(b)2. A custom domain (yourcondo.com) is not required — a vendor subdomain (yourcondo.vendor.com) is sufficient. Compliance is about what is posted and how it is gated, not which URL it lives at.
Both statutes treat "website or application that can be downloaded on a mobile device" as alternatives — so an app alone is statutorily compliant. In practice, most counsel still recommend a parallel browser-accessible site because owners who cannot access the app (no smartphone, locked device, accessibility needs) can produce screenshots that complicate any later enforcement defense. The safest posture is to host both, since most compliance vendors deliver them as one product.
Both statutes require BOTH a publicly-accessible page AND a gated subpage for owners only — but they don't say which documents go where. The conservative reading: governing documents (declaration, bylaws, rules), meeting notices, and structural-inspection summaries can be public; financials, contracts, director certifications, board minutes, and meeting recordings belong behind the owner-only gate because they may contain personal information that must be redacted under FS 718.111(12)(c). Boards routinely err by posting full contracts (with bank/account details) or director certifications (with addresses) on the public side. When in doubt, gate it.
For condos, HB 913 added a hard 30-day posting deadline. The statute says: "Unless a shorter period is otherwise required, a document must be made available on the association's website or made available for download through an application on a mobile device within 30 days after the association receives or creates an official record specified in subparagraph 2." For meeting notices and agendas, shorter statutory deadlines apply — 14 days before a unit owner meeting and per FS 718.112(2)(c) for board meetings. The HOA statute does not impose a 30-day deadline but requires a "current copy" of each document, which case law treats as a similar real-time obligation.
For condos, DBPR can fine up to $5,000 per violation under FS 718.501(1)(e), and HB 913 added explicit website-investigation authority at FS 718.501(1)(u) giving the Division the right to request access and investigate. For HOAs, there is no DBPR enforcement — instead, FS 720.303(5) provides civil damages of $50 per day for willful non-compliance, a 2nd-degree misdemeanor for knowing, willful, and repeated violations with intent to harm (repeated = 2 or more in 12 months), and a 3rd-degree felony for refusing records to avoid detection of a crime. The condo statute also contains a softener that website non-posting alone does not invalidate board actions, but that does not eliminate the regulatory and civil liability.
No. Chapter 719 does not contain a parallel website mandate. FS 719.104 (the official records section) does not impose a website obligation, and FS 719.106 references a website only conditionally. HB 913 made many cooperative changes that parallel the condo amendments but did NOT extend the website mandate to Chapter 719. Cooperative boards should confirm whether their own governing documents independently obligate a website (those private obligations are enforceable as contract), but no statutory mandate applies.

Share this guide