Most HOA software comparisons are useless because the vendors hide their pricing. You ask what it costs, they offer a demo. The demo turns into a proposal forty-eight hours later with a number you cannot benchmark. Your board signs because the alternative is searching again. This article picks the three HOA software platforms Florida boards realistically choose between in 2026 — BuildingLink, PayHOA, and Mosaic — and gives you what the demo will not: published pricing where it exists, third-party analyst estimates where pricing is hidden, contract terms that matter, the pros, the cons, and the underlying numbers in a comparison table.
This article is general information based on publicly available pricing pages, customer reviews on G2 and Capterra, vendor Terms of Purchase, and industry analyst data as of May 2026. Vendor pricing changes frequently and final costs depend on negotiated terms. Always request a current quote directly from each vendor before signing.
BuildingLink — the legacy high-rise standard
BuildingLink runs the front desk of most Florida high-rise condos and a large share of Northeastern co-ops. The company claims more than 7,000 residential communities globally on its current homepage. It is the longest-tenured platform in this comparison (founded 1997) and the strongest for concierge, package, and key-management operations. It is also the platform whose user interface has been described as "designed in the 80s" by reviewers on G2 every year from 2019 through 2025. In July 2022, BuildingLink received a strategic growth investment from Bregal Sagemount, and the 2025 review pattern includes weekly to daily outages cited by long-tenured customers.
BuildingLink
Best if your high-rise already runs on staff-driven concierge workflows and you can absorb a five-figure setup plus annual escalation.
Strengths
- Best-in-class concierge, visitor, and package workflows
- Mass communication: text, email, voice broadcast
- 9.8/10 TrustRadius score on maintenance request tracking
- Deep vertical specialization since 1997
Tradeoffs
- Quote-only pricing with 5% automatic annual escalation
- 3% credit-card surcharge on payments over $3,000
- Reviewers report weekly to daily outages since January 2025
- UI repeatedly described as "designed in the 80s" on G2
"Service has gone downhill since 2020. So many service interruptions that it has a noticeable negative impact on daily operations." — Erin R., Assistant General Manager · Capterra, July 2025
The pricing math comes from industry analyst ITQlick and reviewer disclosure on Capterra: roughly 150 dollars per month for a 50-unit building, 350 dollars per month at 100 units, 500 to 1,200 dollars per month at several hundred units. Implementation runs roughly 1,000 to 10,000 dollars depending on building size. The published Terms of Purchase include an automatic 5 percent annual fee escalation at every renewal, a 3 percent credit-card surcharge on payments over 3,000 dollars, and mandatory binding arbitration before JAMS in New York with a class-action waiver. The HOA-specific gap is significant: BuildingLink was architected for high-rise concierge operations, not for HOA boards making governance decisions under Chapter 720. Boards on BuildingLink typically paper-process violations, cure-period tracking, and fining-committee hearings outside the platform.
PayHOA — the transparent-pricing self-managed pick
PayHOA (founded 2018, Lexington Kentucky, privately held) is the most transparently priced platform in this comparison and the closest non-Mosaic alternative on price. The company claims more than 23,000 HOAs and 622,000 homeowners and publishes its full pricing on payhoa.com/pricing with unit-banded tiers from 49 dollars per month (0-25 units, annual billing) to 275 dollars per month (401-500 units), with a per-unit rate of 55 cents for 500+ units. At 100 units on the annual plan, the effective rate works out to roughly 1.09 dollars per unit per month or about 109 dollars total — cheaper than Mosaic's $199 flat at small sizes, more expensive at sizes above 200 units where PayHOA's banded structure crosses Mosaic's flat rate.
PayHOA
Best if you are a self-managed board on a tight budget and can live without a mobile app or any AI features.
Strengths
- Fully transparent unit-banded pricing on public website
- 30-day free trial without a credit card
- No long-term contracts, no cancellation fees
- Strong accounting (AP/AR, online payments, reports)
Tradeoffs
- No native mobile app — web-only is the top reviewer complaint
- No significant AI offering
- Voting and mass-comms modules described as basic
- No Florida-statute-specific workflows
"There is no mobile app. If you want to access PayHOA from your phone, you have to do so from a browser with a sub-optimal UX/UI." — Verified reviewer · PayHOA · Capterra, 2024
For Florida self-managed boards on a tight budget that can live with web-only access (no mobile app), PayHOA is the most honest competitor on the market. Reviewer feedback on Capterra is generally positive (PayHOA averages 4.5 out of 5 across approximately 200 reviews); the recurring complaints are the absence of a mobile app, inconsistent CSV exports, a basic voting module, and one notable verbatim review describing a "simple accounting statement request outstanding for nine months." The absence of AI and the absence of Florida-specific workflow are the structural differentiators against Mosaic.
Mosaic — Florida-built, $199 per month flat
Full disclosure: this is our product, written by us, on our blog. We will be specific about both what Mosaic does well and what it does not do, because that is the only honest way to write a comparison that includes the author's product.
Mosaic
Best if you are a Florida HOA or condo board that wants statute-aware workflows, transparent pricing, and AI grounded in your own governing documents.
Strengths
- $199 per month flat. No per-unit math. No tiered minimum.
- No annual escalation. No contract lock-in. Month-to-month.
- 3-month free trial runs alongside your current software
- Built for FS 718, 720, HB 1021, HB 1203
- AI chat grounded in your governing documents (not generic)
Tradeoffs
- Florida-only focus — not built for out-of-state boards
- Newer platform with smaller install base than the legacy stack
- No native concierge/visitor management hardware (software-only)
- Not a Yardi Voyager replacement for institutional portfolios
"We built Mosaic because we sat on Florida HOA boards and could not find a tool that knew the difference between Chapter 718 and Chapter 720." — From the Mosaic team
Where Mosaic fits cleanly is the gap neither BuildingLink nor PayHOA fully addresses: a single predictable monthly price ($199), Florida-statute-aware workflows tied to FS 718 and FS 720, and AI grounded in your specific governing documents. At small association sizes PayHOA is cheaper. At 200 units and above, Mosaic is cheaper. At every size, Mosaic is the only platform whose violation, meeting, and records workflows encode the HB 1021 and HB 1203 reforms directly — the fining-committee composition rule, the 14-day notice-and-hearing requirement, the 90-day hearing deadline, the garbage-can and holiday-decoration carve-outs. None of that replaces a Florida community association attorney, but it removes most of the procedural friction that turns into voided decisions and DBPR enforcement letters.
The comparison: where each platform fits, and the pricing behind it
Two ways to compare the three platforms. The first plots them — alongside three more competitors for market context — on the two questions every board weighs before signing: price and switching risk. The second is the underlying numbers for the three head-to-head platforms.
| Platform | Per-unit/mo | Base/mo | Implementation | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuildingLink | Quote only | ~$150-$1,200 est. | $1K-$10K+ (est.) | None |
| PayHOA | ~$0.55-$1.18 | $49 - $275 | $0 (self-serve) | 30 days |
| Mosaic | — | $199/mo flat | $0 (team configures) | 3 months parallel |
Try Mosaic alongside your current software. No Risk!
- Keep yourself compliant on every statute change
- Keep your board compliant across every workflow
- Keep your HOA compliant and your owners happy
Six contract terms boards should check before signing
Pricing is one half of the cost. Contract structure is the other half, and boards almost never read it before signing.
- 1. Annual fee escalation. Ask in writing whether the contract escalates automatically each year and by what percentage. BuildingLink's published terms state 5 percent. Most legacy platforms have similar clauses. Mosaic has none.
- 2. Transaction fee disclosure. Ask for the full schedule of per-transaction fees (ACH, credit card, eCheck, lockbox). BuildingLink's published Terms include a 3% credit-card surcharge on payments over $3,000 and net-30 payment with 1%/month late fee.
- 3. Implementation and onboarding fees. Quote-only platforms routinely bury 4- and 5-figure onboarding charges in the proposal. Ask in writing what implementation costs, what is included, and whether it is refundable if the rollout fails. PayHOA is self-serve at no charge; Mosaic configures the platform with a Florida team at no charge; the legacy stack typically charges.
- 4. Florida-statute-aware workflow. Ask the vendor to demonstrate, live, the workflow for an HB 1203 records request, an HB 1021 quarterly meeting notice, or a fining-committee hearing. Most platforms cannot.
- 5. Data on termination. Ask how long after termination you have to export your data, in what format, and what happens after the window. BuildingLink's window is 30 days, then data is deleted.
- 6. Contract length. Month-to-month or annual? What auto-renews? When does the 30-day notice clock start running? PayHOA and Mosaic are month-to-month; BuildingLink auto-renews annually with a 30-day notice clock that runs from the wrong direction (you have to remember to cancel before, not after, the anniversary).
The Florida-statute gap
This is the structural reason Mosaic exists. Both BuildingLink (1997) and PayHOA (2018) were built before Surfside, before HB 1021, and before HB 1203. They support generic violation tracking, generic meeting management, generic records storage, generic mass communication. Neither publicly advertises workflow tied to:
- FS 718.111(12) — condominium official records and 7-year retention
- FS 718.112(2)(d) — 48-hour board meeting notice and 14-day budget notice
- FS 720.303(2)(c) — HOA board meeting 48-hour conspicuous posting
- FS 720.303(5) — HOA records inspection 10-business-day window
- FS 720.317 — electronic voting consent and audit trail
- HB 1021 (2024) — condo quarterly meetings, director education, milestone/SIRS
- HB 1203 (2024) — HOA criminal penalties, 1,000-parcel audit, 100-parcel website
Boards running on generic workflow find out about Florida-specific procedure the same way most boards do: an arbitration filing, a letter from the DBPR Division of Florida Condominiums, or a voided decision after a recall petition. The platforms are not blameless; they choose what to build, and the national platforms chose breadth across all fifty states over depth in Florida-specific compliance. For full context on the Florida procedural requirements, see our guides on Florida HOA board meetings and Florida condo board meetings.
Key takeaways
- Two of these three platforms publish HOA pricing publicly. PayHOA publishes a banded unit-count tier. Mosaic publishes $199 per month flat. BuildingLink is quote-only with effective per-unit cost that requires a sales call to discover.
- BuildingLink's published Terms include 5 percent automatic annual fee escalation and a 3 percent credit-card surcharge over $3,000. The user interface has been described as "designed in the 80s" by reviewers every year since 2019.
- PayHOA is the most transparent non-Mosaic platform on price but has no native mobile app and no significant AI offering.
- Neither BuildingLink nor PayHOA publicly advertises Florida-statute-specific workflow. Both offer generic violation tracking, generic meeting management, and generic records storage.
- Mosaic is $199 per month flat regardless of association size, no escalation, no lock-in, Florida-built, AI-native. The 3-month free trial runs alongside your current platform so there is no switching risk.
Frequently asked questions
Share this guide